• Adoption: Prohibited in Islam

Adoption is forbidden in Islam. But according to authentic Hadiths related by Al-Bukhari, the Prophet adopted a son named Zaid. Please comment.

Both statements of the prohibition of adoption in Islam and the Prophet's adoption of Zaid are correct. The explanation of these two apparently contradictory facts lies in their chronological order.

Zaid ibn Haritha was a young child when he was kidnapped by fighters who raided the living quarters of his tribe when their men were out on their business. Zaid was sold as a slave and he ended up in Makkah when he was given as a gift by her uncle to Khadeejah, who later was married to Muhammad, her third husband. At that time, he was 25 years of age. Lady Khadeejah was a rich woman who married Muhammad, having learned much about his character which filled her with admiration. At that time, Muhammad was being carefully prepared by Allah for his forthcoming mission as the last prophet to be sent to mankind. Needless to say, neither he nor Khadeejah knew anything at that time. Prophet-hood came 15 years after his marriage.

Khadeejah made a gift of Zaid to her husband so that he would have a good servant.

Zaid's father was full of grief when he learned of what had happened to his son. He tried hard to find out where he was carried to. Perhaps, it was a few years before he learned that Zaid was in Makkah, a slave in one of its most distinguished households. He, therefore, traveled with his brother hoping to buy his son's freedom. When they spoke to Muhammad about Zaid, they requested him to agree to sell Zaid back to them and to accept a reasonable price for him. He made them a different offer saying: "I will charge you nothing. If he prefers to stay with me, I will not part with anyone who prefers my company." They said: "This is indeed a very reasonable offer." When Zaid was called in, Muhammad asked him whether he recognized the two men. On receiving an affirmative answer, Muhammad offered him the choice of going back or staying with him. Unhesitatingly, Zaid chose to stay with Muhammad saying to his father and his uncle, "I have seen things of this man which make me keen never to part with him." When Zaid made his choice, Muhammad took him by the hand and went to the Ka'aba where he addressed the people present saying to them: "Bear witness that I have adopted Zaid as a son who will inherit me and I will inherit him." Zaid's father was gratified and he went back home with his brother.

This is how the adoption of Zaid by the Prophet came to pass, long before he became a prophet. Ever since that day, Zaid was called in Makkah and everywhere else as "Zaid ibn Muhammad." This continued to be the case throughout the 13 years during which the Prophet preached his message in Makkah and in the early years of his stay in Madinah. It was later that the verses of the Qur'an which speak of adoption were revealed. These make it clear that adoption is prohibited and that every adopted son or daughter must be called after his or her real father. This automatically abrogated the adoption of Zaid who reverted to his original name, Zaid ibn Haritha, in compliance with Allah's orders.

The Prophet was very kind to Zaid through their association. He arranged Zaid's marriage to his own wet nurse Umm Ayman who gave birth to Zaid's son Ussamah, whom the Prophet loved very dearly. Later on, the Prophet married Zaid to his own cousin, Lady Zainab, who only accepted the marriage to please the Prophet. The marriage was an unhappy one and Zaid reluctantly divorced Zainab. The seal on the prohibition was placed by Allah Himself when He instructed the Prophet to marry Zainab. Thus, the Prophet demonstrated practically the nullification of all adoption. Had adoption been of any significance, it would not have been possible that the Prophet marries a former wife of his former adopted son. The fact that the marriage took place and was specifically ordered by Allah left no doubt whatsoever that adoption is totally forbidden in Islam.

• Adoption: Voluntary-care and guardianship

You say that adoption is prohibited in Islam. But in English language, the word "adoption" means what you also say to be permitted in Islam, namely the bringing up of another person's child, and to educate and help that child. In my dictionary, the word is defined as: "to take voluntarily into any relationship, especially that of a son." The operative word here is "voluntarily." There is no sense of anything legal taking place.

I have adopted children, and I believe I am bringing them up voluntarily. I have no wish to take away their names from them. Yet I had to go through the legal process of adopting them because without the right sort of papers I would not be able to bring them up and care for them. I would have had to abandon them. I have my work here [in the Kingdom] and I could not have brought these children with me unless they have my name on their passports. To get such passports for them , there is no way other than to go through a lengthy legal process overseas. While I do not disagree with the logic of your reply on adoption, may I point out that you define it in an excessively legalistic way, whereas in English it merely means the voluntary bringing up of children who are not one's own. I am saying this because I realize that simple misunderstanding may often be the cause of major disputes.

I am grateful for bringing up this question which has great practical importance. Let me first sort out the linguistic aspect. In the dictionary I have on my computer, which is a Webster dictionary, the word "adoption" is shown to have six meanings. The one mentioned by my reader is the third one. The two that precede it are: "1. to choose or take and use as one's own: to adopt a nickname. 2. to take and rear (the child of others) as one's own child, especially by a formal legal act." These two meanings of the word are the ones which are forbidden in Islam when it comes to adopting children. It is taking the child, whether he has known parents or not, from a hospital, or an orphanage, or an agency, giving the child one's own family name and claiming that he is one's own child. This is followed by a legal process, which can be very lengthy and complicated to ensure that the child is legally recognized as belonging to the adopting couple as their own.

On the other hand, people may take into their family an orphan child, or one who belongs to a very poor family, and bring it up, giving that child the sort of care and education they would give to their own children. They have no motive to do so other than to be kind to that child. They do not try to claim the child as their own, nor do they give it their own family name. That is a great act of charity, for which God rewards very generously.

My reader points out a practical problem when a family brings up an orphan child. That is the problem of mobility. If the family wants to travel, what would they do with the child in their care? In many countries, they would not be allowed to travel with the child, and many would not give the child a visa, along with the rest of the family. But it is not merely travel that may be an obstacle. There are similar problems that may have repercussions for both the child and the family. Legal adoption, as practiced in Western societies, would put an end to these problems once and for all, because it gives the family the facility to produce documents and papers which would show the child as belonging to that family.

I know a childless couple who were keen to do whatever they could to children who had no family. They were regular visitors to an orphanage in their hometown, where they helped the staff and looked after children. On one of their visits, they were introduced to a new child who was brought in after her grandmother had died, with both her parents having died earlier. They immediately fell in love with the child who also seemed to be fond with them. She would not let go of them. They sought permission of the orphanage authorities to take her home for a few days. Then it was emotionally impossible for them to take her back to the orphanage. They decided to bring her up themselves. The idea of legal adoption did not occur to them, because they knew that it was forbidden in Islam. They arranged for special entries in the government offices concerned that they were looking after the child, but that was the beginning of their troubles. Endless formalities at every step meant that they were always going to and from the government offices, seeking one permission to do this and another to do that. They tried hard with the authorities to find a formula where they could be left in peace to look after the child and give her the best upbringing they could, but that was not possible. What added to their problem was the fact that the man was not based in his own country, as he worked for an international company. When his problems mounted, he felt that the only alternative to abandoning the child was to adopt her formally and to have her added to his passport. When he did that, all his troubles came to an end.

This is the problem my reader is worried about, and is rightly so. Unfortunately it is not an easy problem to solve because legal provisions are meant to protect the interests of children who are in difficult situations. It is when a special case offers a better prospect for the child than [what] the legal provisions are prepared to grant that [child], a problem seems exceedingly difficult. What is needed for legislators is to introduce a situation where a family can be recognized as the legal guardian of a child. With such status the family should be allowed to bring up the child without claiming it as its own. It has to have the freedom to look after the child properly with minimum interference from the authorities. Such interference should aim only to ensure that the child is actually cared for and not abused. If Muslim countries introduce such a position, it may make their social welfare system more complete.

• Adultery: God's forgiveness and marriage

I have had a love affair with a cousin during which we transgressed the limits of what is lawful. Without knowing what was going on between us, our parents agreed to our marriage, while my parents disagreed. They finally relented after much persuasion. My question is whether God's forgiveness is open to us after having committed such a grave sin? Can we escape His punishment for what we have been doing?

The first thing you should understand is that adultery is not merely a grave sin, but it can also preclude marriage altogether. An adulterer may not be married to a chaste woman, even though she and her family agree to the marriage. The same applies to an adulteress, who may not be married to a God-fearing man.

In the Qur'an God states this rule: "An adulterer may not be married except to an adulteress or a non-believer, and an adulteress woman may not be married except to an adulterer or a non-believer. Forbidden is that to believers." (24; 3)

So the first thing you and your cousin should do in order to be able to marry each other is to repent for your sin, pray for God's mercy and forgiveness, and resolve not to commit adultery at all in the future. What is encouraging in your letter is the fact that you realize that you have been so deep in the wrong and you wonder whether you can still earn God's forgiveness.

Let me tell you that God does not close the door to forgiveness as long as we believe in Him and do not associate any partners with Him. Addressing every human being, He says in a Sacred, i.e. Qudsi, Hadith: "If you come to Me with an earth load of sins, but associating no partners with Me, I come to you with an earth load of forgiveness." So the gravity of the sin is no barrier to God's mercy, provided that the repentance is genuine and sincere, and also based on believing in God's oneness.

Moreover, repentance should be given credence, not only by avoiding committing the same sin again, but also by doing good deeds, such as giving money to the poor, night worship, doing the pilgrimage and the Umrah, voluntary fasting, helping people without looking for any reward from them. The more you do of voluntary good action, the greater your reward is. When your reward outweighs your sins, then God's forgiveness is assured. To encourage you on the way to genuine repentance, let me remind you that God credits every good action with at least 10 times its value, while He records against us only those forbidden actions we may commit, as they are worth. That makes earning God's forgiveness easy once a person is determined to achieve it.

Refer this article to Someone

Back Contents Next