Ali Ibn Abu Talib: Loving Him Does Not Warrant Arguments
Why was Ali ibn Abu Talib not chosen as the Caliph immediately after the Prophet, peace be upon him, when he was the most suitable person among the Prophet's companions? If you do not answer me this question, I will think that the Shias are more correct in their views than us.
Our reader states in his letter that
he has asked several people on this but received no satisfactory answer. He also
goes into a great length of describing the qualities of Ali, which, in His view,
qualifies him as the best to assume the leadership of the Muslim community after
the Prophet, peace be upon him.
The first thing I would like to say to this reader and others who dwell on such
matters is that however much time we spend over past controversy, we cannot
alter the facts of history. Nor can we truly find out the real intention behind
an action done or a statement said by any one who lived in an earlier
generation. Yet if we make judgments on people's characters on the basis of
historical reports, God will ask us about these judgments and we expose
ourselves to his punishment if our judgment is wrong. So what is the use of
saying today who was better suited for this role or that role at any period of
history?
The first Muslim community chose Abu Bakr to be the first Caliph after the
Prophet. That choice was unanimous. Is it not enough for us to remember the
Hadith: "My community cannot unanimously approve something wrong."
This means that since the Muslims in Madinah, who were the Prophet's companions,
unanimously chose Abu Bakr, then he was the right choice. But suppose he was
not, then who are we to judge those companions of the Prophet, peace be upon
him, and their actions? Besides, what purpose would it serve?
Having said that, I wish to add that all Sunni Muslims love Ali ibn Abu Talib
dearly. How could a Muslim refrain from loving such a great servant of Islam,
when he was also a member of the Prophet's household and praised by the Prophet,
peace be upon him, greatly? But to love him does not mean to engage into
argument about whether he should have been this or that. Such matters cannot be
influenced now by any argument. Hence, we do not engage in them.
Appearance: Beard Recommended & the Reason for It
Appearance: Hair Transplant
Is it permissible to resort to hair transplant in order to cover one's
baldness? Some people suggest that since the removal of gray hair is
forbidden, then treating baldness is also forbidden. Please comment.
Baldness is still incurable. There are some medications, which help to
reduce hair loss, but it is not possible yet to make a person's hair grow
after he has gone bald. The only way to cover baldness is either by hair
transplant or wearing a wig. The latter is forbidden because it is
fraudulent. It gives a false impression. The Prophet, peace be upon him,
spoke strongly against women who add hair to their own in order to give a
false impression of themselves, considering this as an aspect of acquiring
charm and changing God's creation.
Yet the intention is an important aspect in all this. If a man feels he
needs to have a hair transplant, the reason is clearly important. If he
wants to give a false impression of himself or his age before making a
marriage proposal, then it is forbidden for him to do so, or to do what is
involved in such deception. On the other hand, if one is by nature very shy
and his baldness causes him much annoyance or embarrassment as he feels
'eyes stirring at him', then resorting to some means to reduce such
embarrassment is permissible. If the only way is through hair transplant,
then it is permissible.
As you see, we cannot give a blanket verdict to apply to each and every
case. Intention behind an action is extremely important.
| Back | Contents | Next |